Scheme language standardization process
Alex Shinn scripsit: > Sure, you can change your mind about what you think is good for WG2, > but you can't retroactively change the vote. Pending a proper WG2 > vote, the WG1 members must act under the assumption that WG2 will have > R6RS-style blobs only. Actually it's the other way around: what WG2 voted for was "homogenous numeric arrays", without specifying how they would be implemented. See http://tinyurl.com/wg2-ballot . BlobAPI is a proposal that would handle both that and R6RS-style bytevector accessors and mutators using the same machinery. -- A few times, I did some exuberant stomping about, John Cowan like a hippo auditioning for Riverdance, though cowan@x I stopped when I thought I heard something at http://ccil.org/~cowan the far side of the room falling over in rhythm with my feet. --Joseph Zitt _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports